If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only accomplished In the event the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
In that perception, case legislation differs from a single jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in The big apple would not be decided using case legislation from California. Rather, New York courts will evaluate the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions around the issue exist, New York courts could possibly have a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority rather than binding authority. Other factors for example how aged the decision is and also the closeness to the facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common regulation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
However it is actually made crystal clear that police is free to consider action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also guarantee regard of your family lose in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Looking at the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been obtained. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated above. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help from the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. Read more
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents from the boy or Female usually do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they could Lower off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, more info if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is well-settled that though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the benefit of each of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of suitable candidates that are found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded through the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case legislation inside of a particular court. Indeed, Each and every circuit has its personal set of binding case regulation. Because of this, a judgment rendered during the Ninth Circuit will not be binding inside the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple had two young children of their have at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement within the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced youthful children.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, aside from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $200. In addition, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's got issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.